Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Kempthorne
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-1696PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff David McDonald, an employee of the United States Park Police (“USPP”), brings claims against the Secretary of the Interior and USPP employees Diana Smith, Philip Beck, and Warren Boyer, 1 alleging violations of McDonald’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights, a hostile work environment, and retaliation. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, arguing that McDonald’s claims are untimely, that special factors counsel hesitation in creating a remedy for McDonald’s alleged constitutional violations, and that the…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. ScaliaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Jefferson v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Coleman v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Smart v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.