Legal Opinion
OPUS III-VII Corp. v. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 1, 1996No. 95APE05-595PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Petree, Judge.
This matter is before this court upon the appeal of plaintiff, OPUS III-VII Corporation (“OPUS”), from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying OPUS’s request for injunctive and declaratory relief.
Upon appeal, OPUS sets forth four assignments of error:
“I. The common pleas court erred by deferring to the Pharmacy Board’s power to interpret the meaning of ‘unopened’ in its own rule where the alleged ‘interpretation’ is plainly inconsistent with the express language of the rule, O.A.C. § 4729-9-04.
“II. The common pleas court erred by affirming a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Best & Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Jones Metal Products Co. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. McLean v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Saunders v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Howell v. Dept. of Job, 08 Be 25 (3-27-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- CHS-Lake Erie, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of MedicaidOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Huff v. Ohio State Racing Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Ex Rel. DeMuth v. State Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.