In Re the Personal Restraint of Plunkett
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, C.J.
Noel Plunkett seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from a prison disciplinary hearing in which Plunkett was found guilty of raping a fellow inmate. Plunkett contends that his due process rights were violated by holding the disciplinary hearing over the telephone and by using the victim's polygraph test results against him. We disagree.
At all times relevant to this petition, Plunkett has been a federal prisoner housed in Washington state facilities on a 15-year maximum bank robbery sentence. As of March 1986, Plunkett anticipated a federal presumptive parole date of August 25, 1986.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re the Personal Restraint of HewsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PaschkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- In Re HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of LelandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In Re LelandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- In Re the Personal Restraint of PlunkettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.