Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Plunkett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 19, 1990No. 23435-8-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

57 Wn. App. 230 (1990)

788 P.2d 1090

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of NOEL E. PLUNKETT, Petitioner.

No. 23435-8-I.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

March 19, 1990.

Neil M. Fox and Helen A. Anderson of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for petitioner.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, and Aaron Owada, Assistant, for respondent.

COLEMAN, C.J.

Noel Plunkett seeks relief from personal restraint resulting from a prison disciplinary hearing in which Plunkett was found guilty of raping a fellow inmate. Plunkett contends that his due process rights were violated by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API