In Re the Personal Restraint of Paschke
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Herman Ross Paschke seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following the superior court’s determination he is a sexually violent predator. See RCW 71.09, Washington’s sexually violent predators act. Mr. Paschke challenges the court’s use of his prior convictions to support its determination. He contends those convictions are invalid because he pleaded guilty without knowing the State later would use them to support his confinement under the act. He also raises numerous other issues, including whether RCW 71.09 and the conditions of his confinement thereunder violate his constitutional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- State v. BartonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. McDermondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Born v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.