Legal Opinion

State v. Looby

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2018No. 105354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.:

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, William Looby ("Looby") appeals his conviction and sentence. In addition to Looby's five assignments of error, we sua sponte asked the parties to brief a supplemental assignment of error regarding whether the trial court complied with the requirements of Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c). Based on the record and the parties' supplemental briefs, we find that the trial court failed to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) when it accepted Looby's guilty plea and that the lack of compliance warrants reversal of the trial court's judgment.

I. Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AvalosOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. LoobyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API