Atmel Corp. v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CONSTRUING ’750, ’776, AND ’811 PATENTS; DENYING CROSS-MOTIONS TO STRIKE; AND DENYING IN PART AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INDEFINITENESS
FERN M. SMITH, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Pending before the Court is the parties’ dispute about the proper construction of three patents that relate to the production and design of computer memory chips, called EEPROMs, that are programmable, electrically erasable, and non-volatile. These chips are useful in applications, such as programmable car radios, in which it is advantageous to enable the device to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Atmel Corporation v. Information Storage Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Astra Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- KX Industries, L.P. v. Culligan Water Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.