Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1999No. 94-CV-6534LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is a patent infringement action brought by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“B & L”) against Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (“Alcon”). B & L alleges that Alcon has infringed on United States Patent No. 5,096,607 (“the ’607 patent”), which claims an invention in a process for simultaneously cleaning and disinfecting contact lenses using a single solution.
On September 16, 1999, this court issued a Decision and Order that, inter alia, denied Alcon’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Indefiniteness. See Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Alcon Labs., Inc., 64…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Shatterproof Glass Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Libbey-Owens Ford Company and Leybold-Heraeus Gmbh, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Al-Site Corporation and Magnivision, Inc. v. Vsi International, Inc. And Myron Orlinsky, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Seattle Box Company, Inc., D/B/A Seattle-Tacoma Box Company v. Industrial Crating & Packing, Inc., and James F. RennelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Daniel B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. Daniel B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. Daniel B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019