Legal Opinion

KX Industries, L.P. v. Culligan Water Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 3, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-88-RRMPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Plaintiff KX Industries, L.P. is a limited partnership or ganized under the laws of Delaware with its principal place of business in Orange, Connecticut. Plaintiff Koslow Technologies Corporation is a Connecticut corporation with its principal place of business in Orange, Connecticut. Koslow Technologies is the owner of U.S.Patents Nos. 5,249,948 (“the ’948 patent”), 5,189,092 (“the ’092 patent”), 5, 147,722 (“the ’722 patent”) and 5,019,811 (“the ’311 patent”), all pertaining to extruded carbon blocks used in water filters. KX Industries…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Bp Chemicals Limited and Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferrari v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. KX Industries, L.P. v. Pur Water Purification Products, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  3. Exxon Research & Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Kraft v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API