Legal Opinion

Malone v. Jones

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,686PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Smith district court; Richard M. PickLER, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

This action is to recover damages caused by eating tainted meat at the defendant’s home.

The evidence shows that defendant Henry D. Jones was carrying on farming operations on a farm owned and occupied by his parents, with whom he lived. Needing help, Henry sent his father to the plaintiff, who was looking for work, to employ him. This was done. The plaintiff testified explicitly, and repeated the statement in substance, that David Jones employed him to work for Henry, who paid the wages. Defendants David H. Jones and wife boarded the hands…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Parks v. C. C. Yost Pie Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Ketterer v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  4. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API