Tomlinson v. Armour & Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 45 Vroom 274.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellok.
This writ of error is brought to review a decision of the Supreme Court sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration.
The record returned by that court to the writ of error, besides reciting the declaration and the demurrer-thereto, sets forth simply that the court, having heard the argument of counsel upon the demurrer, and having duly considered the same, did order that the demurrer be sustained, with costs. There is no more formal entry of judgment, nor any award of a specific sum for costs.
Upon this récord the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
- Van Winkle v. American Steam Boiler Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
- Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Schubert v. J. R. Clark Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Davis v. Van Camp Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.