Legal Opinion

Moore v. George Heebner, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1983No. 166PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from a non pros or dismissal for failure to prosecute. Consequently, appellant raises only one issue: whether that non pros was properly granted. Upon consideration we conclude that it was and, accordingly, affirm.

Procedural History

The relevant procedural history is as follows. Appellant brought suit in February of 1973. Appellee Richardson filed an answer in April of 1973. On October 21, 1976 appellant’s first counsel withdrew his appearance. Appellee Richardson filed an amended answer in February, 1977. Preliminary objections were filed by appellee Delaware…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. White v. AlstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Kennedy v. Bulletin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Marino v. HackmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Metz Contracting, Inc. v. Riverwood Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Carroll v. KimmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Florig v. Estate of O'HaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Martin v. Grandview HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API