Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Kimmel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1987No. 1569PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the entry of a judgment of non pros 1 against appellant Hugh Carroll as trustee ad litem for the estate of Rita Carroll. Appellant claims the trial court erred in granting a judgment of non pros in favor of appellee, Dr. Murray H. Kimmel. We disagree with appellant and consequently affirm the judgment.

The following chronology is drawn from the record and the uncontested facts in the briefs:

February 27, 1978 — Rita Carroll dies.

February 28, 1980 — Plaintiff-trustee files a notice complaint with the arbitration panels for health care claiming appellee,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James Bros. Co. v. Union B. & T. Co. of DuBoisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Gallagher v. Jewish Hosp. Assn. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Kennedy v. Bulletin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Moore v. George Heebner, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Valley Peat & Humus v. Sunnylands, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Elcomp, Inc. v. DroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Neshaminy Constructors, Inc. v. Plymouth TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Roseman v. Hospital of University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Abraham Zion Corp. v. After Six, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API