Legal Opinion

Martin v. Grandview Hospital

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1988PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting plaintiffs petition to reactivate a case which had previously been terminated for inactivity on the docket pursuant to local rule. Because we find that the trial court failed to apply the appropriate “good cause” standard for reactivation of such cases, we vacate the order reactivating the case and remand for further proceedings.

On July 9, 1980, plaintiff initiated this medical malpractice action against defendants Grandview Hospital and Robert J. Lavin, M.D., by filing a complaint with the Arbitration Panel on Health Care. 1 On December…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mattos v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Gerace v. Holmes Protection of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Metz Contracting, Inc. v. Riverwood Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Corcoran v. FiorentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pine Township Water Co. v. Felmont Oil Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Setty v. KneppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Clinger v. TilleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Matusow v. ZiegerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Edmond, G. v. Phila Park CasinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API