Legal Opinion

Wilson v. F & H Construction Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1988No. 87-047, 87-263PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

In consolidated cases, Constance Wilson appeals from summary judgments granted to F & H Construction Company and Taylor Plumbing, Inc., in negligence actions brought by Wilson to recover for bodily injury sustained when she fell into a hole. Wilson also included the city of Omaha as a defendant, but the action against the city is not involved in Wilson’s appeal.

On February 9, 1982, F & H Construction, as general contractor, entered a contract with the housing authority of the city of Omaha for the construction of 42 units of scattered-site housing, which included construction of a six-plex.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Zeller v. County of HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Alires v. Southern Pacific CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Gall v. Great Western Sugar Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bedrosky v. HinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Burns v. Veterans of Foreign WarsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Riley v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API