Legal Opinion

Gall v. Great Western Sugar Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1985No. 83-636PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Debby Gall, alleges that the defendants-appellees, Great Western Sugar Company and its parent, Hunt International Resources Corporation, intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon her and breached their duty of fair and good faith dealing by certain telephone calls they caused to be made to her at her place of employment. In this appeal Debby Gall claims the trial court erred in sustaining Great Western’s motion for summary judgment, in sustaining Hunt International’s special appearance, and in dismissing her action as to both defendants. We affirm.

We first consider…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. LaSalle Extension University v. FogartyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Olson v. Union Fire Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nerud v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hassing v. WortmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. MendezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Braesch v. Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API