Legal Opinion

Blashaski v. Classified Risk Ins. Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1970No. 172PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

This appeal involves the construction of a standard automobile liability policy, and although the facts are stipulated the parties do not seem to be in agreement upon the issue. No doubt this is due to the indefiniteness of the pleadings and the inadequacy of the stipulation of facts. Cavadini attempts to assert a cause of action by “realleges the facts of the collision as contained in the third party complaint,” and then alleges that prior to the collision the defendant Roger Schulter provided beer and other intoxicating liquors to the extent that caused the intoxication of Peter Cavadini…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Garcia v. HargroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. Schulter v. RoraffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Royal Transit Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hart v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API