Care Medical Equipment, Inc. v. Baldwin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiff employer brought this action against defendant employee for breach of a noncompetition provision in an employment contract between the parties. The trial court ruled that the noncompetition provision of the contract was void and unenforceable, and it dismissed plaintiffs claims. After entering judgment in defendant’s favor, the court awarded defendant $25,000 in attorney fees. The Com! of Appeals reversed the award of attorney fees. Care Medical Equipment, Inc. v. Baldwin, 154 Or App 678, 963 P2d 85 (1998). The issue is whether the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Pettigrove v. Corvallis Lumber Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Bauman v. BaumanOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Bennett v. BaughOregon Supreme Court · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leach v. Scottsdale Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Golden Pisces, Inc. v. Fred Wahl Marine Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sherwood Park Business Center, LLC v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
- King v. NEVERSTILL ENTERPRISES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.