Legal Opinion

King v. NEVERSTILL ENTERPRISES, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2011No. 070708392; A141658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants appeal a judgment in their favor in a breach of contract action. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs claim with prejudice pursuant to ORCP 54 B(2) but refused to award defendants their requested attorney fees and costs. Defendants raise two assignments of error, together amounting to an assertion that the court erred in refusing to award them their fees and costs. First, defendants argue that the court erred in concluding that, because plaintiffs claim was dismissed on the ground that she was not the real party in' interest, defendants were not entitled to recover attorney fees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bodenhamer v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Carlson v. BlumensteinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gaona v. BLACKETTEROregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Golden West Insulation, Inc. v. Stardust Investment Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherwood Park Business Center, LLC v. TaggartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Goodsell v. Eagle-Air Estates Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. A & E Security & Electronic Solutions, Inc. v. Fortalesa, IncorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Goodsell v. Eagle-Air Estates Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. King v. NEVERSTILL ENTERPRISES, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API