Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Bauman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of a tax provision in a property settlement agreement. The question was litigated upon an order requiring the defendant husband to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to pay certain taxes plaintiff wife contends are to be paid by him pursuant to a decree which incorporated the property settlement agreement. The court held the agreement did not require the payment of such taxes.

The property settlement agreement was in the form of a stipulation dictated by the attorney for the plaintiff to a court reporter, in the courtroom, in…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. StolzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Care Medical Equipment, Inc. v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Investment Service Co. v. SmitherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Erickson Hardwood Co. v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Association of Unit Owners of the Inn v. GruenfeldOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API