Legal Opinion
Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court
Decided April 27, 2006No. TC 4717-19 4723PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. INTRODUCTION
Following the court's decision in Freitag v. Dept. of Rev.,18 OTR 368 (2005), Lincoln County (the county) filed a Statement for Award of Attorney Fees and Costs and Disbursements under Tax Court Rule (TCR) 68 and ORS 20.105.1 Plaintiffs (taxpayers) timely objected to that statement. The court held a hearing on the matter and received evidence from taxpayers consisting of a copy of the trial transcript; the county submitted no evidence.
II. FACTS
In the statement, the county seeks $2,610 in expenses for work performed by its attorney and $5,400 in expenses for work performed by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Woods v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2002
- Poddar v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Lewis v. Worldwide Imports, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curtis I v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Tax Court · 2006
- Leaper v. Dept. of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2008
- Colonial Plaza v. Washington Cty. Asse., Tc-Md 100396b (or.tax 6-28-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
- Donahue v. Multnomah County Assessor, Tc-Md 110242c (or.tax 11-23-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011
- Huang v. Department of Revenue, Tc 4880 (or.tax 7-27-2009)Oregon Tax Court · 2009