Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Noble

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1978No. 40789PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 Cal.App.3d 120 (1978)

144 Cal. Rptr. 710

JONATHAN B. HOROWITZ et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants,

v.

LOWELL NOBLE et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Docket No. 40789.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

March 28, 1978.

COUNSEL

William Scammon for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Lowell Noble, in pro. per., William M. Gwire and William E. Taggart, Jr., for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

OPINION

ANELLO, J.[*] —

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is an appeal by plaintiffs and cross-defendants and a cross-appeal by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Dabney v. DabneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Roling v. E TRADE SECURITIES, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  4. Navarro v. PerronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. White v. DorfmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API