In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motions (collectively “Motions”) to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act” or “PSLRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-4, et seq. For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND...........................................271
II. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited230 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
225 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Bains v. MooresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Teamsters Local 617 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Apollo Group, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- National Junior Baseball League v. Pharmanet Development Group Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.