Legal Opinion

Hirschle v. Mabe, 22954 (4-27-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2009No. Nos. 22954, 22975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} The central issue in this appeal concerns the Workers' Compensation Act's coverage formula. Is an injury suffered on an employer's premises "received in the course of, and arising out of" employment when the employee is voluntarily on the premises solely to pick up a paycheck, an activity that the employer's pay policy expressly permits but does not require? The trial court said it is, and it granted Tamara Hirschle's (Appellee) partial summary judgment motion. Both the Montgomery County Stillwater Health Center and the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation (Appellants) disagree.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lord v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Ruckman v. Cubby Drilling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bralley v. DaughertyOhio Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. White v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Guzauskas v. RyanClermont County Municipal Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API