Legal Opinion

Weinberger v. Rall

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

In this action at law to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff in an automobile collision, defendant pleaded the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. After an evidentiary hearing on that defense, the court held that the action had not been commenced within the two-year period of limitations for that type of action (ORS 12.110 (1)) and dismissed the complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

The accident occurred on September 19, 1969, in Washington County, Oregon. At that time, and while in Oregon, defendant was a resident of Clackamas County, and was employed in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. City of Portland v. WelchOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. PyleOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Larson v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1977
  3. Chapman v. PerronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Tischhauser v. TrottmanOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API