Legal Opinion

Larson v. Allen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, C. J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant’s decedent, Velma Rae Allen, hereinafter referred to as the defendant. In addition to a general denial, defendant as an affirmative defense pleaded the statute of limitations. By stipulation, the segregated issue of the statute of limitations was tried by the court without a jury. The court held that plaintiff’s cause was barred and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

This action arose ont of a collision that occurred on August 7, 1959 in Multnomah county between an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guilford v. BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Hampe v. SchafferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Santaniello v. LevyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bracken v. McAlveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Kleila v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sylling v. Agsco Distributors, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Weinberger v. RallOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Edsill v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Tischhauser v. TrottmanOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Edsill v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API