Legal Opinion

Acculog, Inc. v. Peterson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1984No. 18133PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Plaintiffs Acculog appeal from a judgment of “no cause of action” which was entered after a jury returned a special verdict. Acculog’s 1977 four-wheel-drive Ford E250 Quadravan, estimated at a value of $7,000, caught fire and was destroyed later in the same day that defendant Peterson Ford had installed a new fuel filter to cor*729rect overheating in the engine. Also destroyed in the fire was Acculog’s geological equipment consisting of a Mount Sopris bore-hole logging unit mounted on the vehicle and stipulated to have a value of $41,-687.95. Acculog claimed that the destruction of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Cook Associates, Inc. v. WarnickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Management Committee of Graystone Pines Homeowners Ass'n Ex Rel. Owners of the Condominiums v. Graystone Pines, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. ERA Helicopters, Inc. v. Digicon Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kilpatrick v. Wiley, Rein & FieldingUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Brewer v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sawyers v. FMA Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Henderson v. For-Shor Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API