Legal Opinion
Eleanor Ackerman v. York Corporation, Angeline Loesch and Henry Loesch v. York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1958No. 16012, 16013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in these actions, Eleanor Ackerman and Angeline Loesch, were at work for the Litchfield Produce Company in the company’s chicken picking room in its building at Litchfield, Minnesota, on October 20th, 1956, when explosions and fire occurred in the building and inflicted serious injuries upon them. These suits were for damages from alleged negligence. Henry Loesch, husband of Angeline, joined her as plaintiff in order to recover the damages he sustained on account of the injuries to her. Federal jurisdiction resulted from diversity and the amounts involved.
Th…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Hartmon v. National Heater Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Boyd v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Lynghaug v. PayteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woolard v. JLG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Capital Funds, Inc., Austin E. Gatlin and Mrs. Erma S. Gatlin v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Linda Thompson and Roy Hedbert v. Hirano Tecseed Company, Ltd. v. Sheldahl, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Linda Thompson v. Hirano Tecseed Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Thompson v. Hirano Tecseed Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005