Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Barlow Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1939No. Nos. 32,148, 32,149PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Two actions were instituted to recover damages, one by Anne Murphy to recover for personal injuries; the other by the special administratrix of Max Zelickson to recover damages for his death. A demurrer was interposed to each complaint by defendant Ernest M. Ganley Company, Inc. Plaintiff Anne Murphy appeals from the order sustaining the demurrer. In the other case the appeal is from the judgment entered after demurrer was sustained. Hereafter we shall regard the case as though Anne Murphy alone were plaintiff since the problems presented are identical.

Defendants Red River…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Ferraro v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Goar v. Village of StephenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Foley v. the Pittsburgh-Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Saylor v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  4. Jenkins v. North Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API