Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment.
We have frequently held that such a motion should not be granted where it appears, after examination of the opening-brief and the papers filed in support of the motion, that the case cannot be decided without examining the entire record. (Brown v. Gow, 126 Cal. App. 113 [14 Pac. (2d) 322]; Ross v. Mahoney, 134 Cal. App. 199 [25 Pac. (2d) 268]; Barr v. Hall, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 426 [49 Pac. (2d) 1124].)
At least two of the points raised on this appeal could not be decided without a complete examination of the entire record. This is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Barr v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ross v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- County of Riverside v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Taylor v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.