Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Fresno Traction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1936No. Civ. 1745PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment.

We have frequently held that such a motion should not be granted where it appears, after examination of the opening-brief and the papers filed in support of the motion, that the case cannot be decided without examining the entire record. (Brown v. Gow, 126 Cal. App. 113 [14 Pac. (2d) 322]; Ross v. Mahoney, 134 Cal. App. 199 [25 Pac. (2d) 268]; Barr v. Hall, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 426 [49 Pac. (2d) 1124].)

At least two of the points raised on this appeal could not be decided without a complete examination of the entire record. This is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. GowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Barr v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Ross v. MahoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. WolfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. County of Riverside v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Kelly v. LiddicoatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Taylor v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API