Legal Opinion
Plymouth Stamping v. Lipshu
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1990No. 83206, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArcher, J.
(for affirmance). We granted leave limited to the issue whether the employee-claimants, who were engaged in a strike against their employer, were disqualified for unemployment benefits pursuant to the labor dispute provisions of the Michigan Employment Security Act, MCL 421.29(8); MSA 17.531(8), when they were permanently replaced during the course of the strike. 1
I believe the workers’ disqualification ended upon their permanent replacement and any remand must instruct the mesc to determine the suitability of any available work under § 29 of the MESA.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In the fall of 1980,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. MacKay Radio & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Linski v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Department of Environmental Quality v. Waterous CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wohlert Special Products, Inc v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.