Legal Opinion

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Employment Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 22, 1997No. 96-1267PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

The issue we face in this judicial review proceeding is whether a letter the employer sent striking workers notifying them that they were being permanently replaced severed the employment relationship between the employer and these claimants. The agency found there was such a severance of employment and that the severance was the cause of the unemployment. The agency therefore concluded that the striking workers who applied for unemployment benefits (claimants) were not disqualified from such benefits under the provisions of Iowa Code section 96.5(4) (1993), a labor dispute…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Gerst v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Federico v. Brannan Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Taylor v. Iowa Department of Job ServiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sondra Irving v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. DohertyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Eaton v. Iowa Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Titan Tire Corp. v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  5. Timothy T. Bradshaw, plaintiff-appellant/cross-appellee v. Cedar Rapids Airport Commission, defendant-appellee/cross-appellant.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API