Legal Opinion

Department of Environmental Quality v. Waterous Co

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2008No. Docket 272968PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Waterous Co. (Waterous) appeals as of right the judgment in favor of plaintiff Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) entered after a bench trial. This case arises out of the DEQ’s claim for damages and injunctive relief against Waterous for alleged contamination of certain property and the adjoining Boardman River. We affirm.

I. BASIC FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. FACTS

This case stems from the use of certain property located adjacent to the Boardman River in Traverse City, Michigan. Traverse City Iron Works (TCIW) used the property at issue (the Site) for a foundry…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County v. Lfg, LLC Navistar International Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Township of Fraser v. Harvey HaneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Nicholas David Burnett v. Tracy Lynn AholaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Vincent Owen v. Dennis ContoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API