Rogers v. Goad
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
The only issue presented is whether a permissive-user employee, may stack uninsured motorist coverage under his employer’s automobile fleet insurance policy. We find that the employee, an unnamed insured, covered under the policy solely because of the policy provisions covering permissive use or occupancy, may not stack uninsured motorist coverages under the employer’s commercial fleet policy.
The appellee, Roy Dale Rogers (employee), was injured in an automobile accident when the appellant, Steve Allen Goad, an underinsured motorist, crossed the center line and struck the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Lake v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Torres v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Townsend v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Stanton v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.