Legal Opinion

Stanton v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 24, 1987No. 64259PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Chief Justice.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma has certified the following questions of law pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act: 1(1) Under the stipulated facts, can Bradley K. Slanton stack uninsured motorist coverage for the 379 H.B. Fuller vehicles insured by the American Mutual Fleet Policy?(2) If the concept of stacking is applicable to uninsured motorist claims of an additional insured permissive user of a fleet vehicle, is the “our limit of liability” clause of the insurance policy valid and applicable to preclude…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  2. Babcock v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Rogers v. GoadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Torres v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API