Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Stanfield

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1979PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REED, Justice.

I

This case presents a question of first impression in this state. In 1970 we held in Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. Siddons, Ky., 451 S.W.2d 831, that “stacking” of uninsured motorist coverage by the named insured is permitted where there are separate policies for each vehicle insured and where the named insured has not rejected the coverage in writing. This view was confirmed in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Napier, Ky., 505 S.W.2d 169 (1974), and Siddons’ construction of KRS 304.20-020 was followed in Zurich Insurance Co. v. Hall, Ky., 516 S.W.2d 861 (1974).

The case before us…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sturdy v. Allied Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  3. Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. SiddonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. v. GlassKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Simon v. Continental Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API