Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1899PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The animals were transported by connecting lines from Nashville, Tenn., to New Bern, N.C. under a bill of lading limiting the common-law liability of common carriers, in consideration of reduced rates. In the transit one of the animals, a mule, died on the (237) cattle car of the defendant.

His Honor charged the jury that, notwithstanding the contract, the defendant was liable for the exercise of proper care in handling and transporting the stock over its line; that the burden was upon the plaintiff to show want of ordinary and proper care, and that upon the whole evidence there was no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The Edwin I. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pollard v. VintonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Tucker v. . SatterthwaiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. . McDuffieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Selby v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Harper Furniture Co. v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Ange v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Hinkle v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Gwyn Harper Manufacturing Co. v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Mfg. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API