Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1900PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for injuries to a carload of cattle resulting from delay in transportation. The complaint, among other allegations, contains the following:

"3. That on or about 4 November, 1896, the plaintiffs shipped from Lenoir, N.C. to Hickory, N.C. over the railroad of the Chester and Lenoir Railroad Company, thirty head of cattle; that said cattle were shipped from Lenoir, N.C. on Wednesday, 4 November, 1896, at 2 o'clock a.m., and reached Hickory at about 4 a.m., of the same morning, and were at once turned over to and received by the defendant for further…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Compania De Navigacion La Flecha v. BrauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. State v. . McDuffieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Mitchell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. E. H. Emery & Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  4. Mfg. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Anthony v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API