Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 9, 1900PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to recover damages for injuries to a carload of cattle resulting from delay in transportation. The complaint, among other allegations, contains the following:
"3. That on or about 4 November, 1896, the plaintiffs shipped from Lenoir, N.C. to Hickory, N.C. over the railroad of the Chester and Lenoir Railroad Company, thirty head of cattle; that said cattle were shipped from Lenoir, N.C. on Wednesday, 4 November, 1896, at 2 o'clock a.m., and reached Hickory at about 4 a.m., of the same morning, and were at once turned over to and received by the defendant for further…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Compania De Navigacion La Flecha v. BrauerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State v. . McDuffieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Mitchell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thayer v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- E. H. Emery & Co. v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Mfg. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Anthony v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.