Legal Opinion

Tucker v. . Satterthwaite

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Aotion oe trespass quare clausum fregit, tried before .Boykiu, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1896, of Pitt Superior Court, iuvolviug tbe title to laud described in tbe complaint as follows: “Lying on tbe Pea Branch Pocosin, beginning at a pine, slanding in tbe branch below tbe Bee Gum Island, and running with tbe middle of saicl branch, tbe courses thereof, to tbe line of tbe Thomas Jordan land (now owned by tbe plaintiff), and then with said line to a corner of tbe lands…

Read the full summary

Aotion oe trespass quare clausum fregit, tried before .Boykiu, J., and a jury, at March Term, 1896, of Pitt Superior Court, iuvolviug tbe title to laud described in tbe complaint as follows: “Lying on tbe Pea Branch Pocosin, beginning at a pine, slanding in tbe branch below tbe Bee Gum Island, and running with tbe middle of saicl branch, tbe courses thereof, to tbe line of tbe Thomas Jordan land (now owned by tbe plaintiff), and then with said line to a corner of tbe lands of the heirs of Thomas Little, and with their line out to tbe Pea Branch Pocosin, to Stephen Little line (now the…

1Opinion of the Court

Douglas, J.:

This is an action of trespass involving the title to the land in controversy, which depends upon the location of two grants. The real point in dispute seems to be whether the line constituting the northern boundary of the Smith grant and the southern boundary of the Brinkley grant, runs from “F,” an admitted corner, to “G” or to “IT,” as stated in the case on appeal. The merits of this case were ably and elaborately argued before this court, and we regret our inability to determine the matter, but we.cannot undertake to review a judgment based upon issues which utterly fail to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Denmark v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Bonds v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. McDonald v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Patton v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Mial v. Ellington.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Mitchell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API