Legal Opinion

Mfg. Co. v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1901PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the recovery of twenty bags of flour lost in transit. The plaintiff alleges in his complaint, which is apparently sustained by the evidence, that it is the assignee of the bill of lading for a large amount of flour shipped from Circleville, Ohio, to J. A. Durham Co., Lenoir, N.C. all of which was delivered except the 20 bags said to have been lost. The answer denied every allegation of the complaint, either directly or for want of knowledge. As an additional defense, the answer alleged: "That no claim for loss or damage was made by plaintiff above named within thirty…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Sherrill v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Bogan v. Carolina Central RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Cable v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. Reynolds v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API