Legal Opinion

Bard v. Kent

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1939No. Civ. 12153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MoCOMB, J. —

Prom a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover $22,403.88 alleged to have been received by defendant for the use of plaintiff’s decedent Ruth Roland Bard, defendant appeals.

These are the essential facts:

Plaintiff is special administrator of the estate of Ruth Roland Bard, deceased, who died September 22, 1937. January 25, 1927, decedent advanced $38,000 to Mr. L. Lewyn and his wife and received a note and first trust deed on certain real property located in' Los Angeles County (referred to by the parties as “No. 19…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Freese v. Odd Fellows' Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Donovan v. KemperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kent v. First Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Estate of ReinickeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Lake v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API