Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Kemper

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1915No. Civ. No. 1434PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. G. Reisner, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this action the plaintiff’s complaint in substance alleged that in consideration of a loan of one thousand five hundred dollars to the defendant, he and Mrs. C. B. McMorry, plaintiff’s assignor executed and delivered their joint promissory note in the amount of the loan to George W. Locke; that Mrs. McMorry was merely an accommodation maker of the note; that she received no part of the borrowed money, hut that it was all received and retained by the defendant, and that plaintiff’s assignor paid to Locke, the holder and owner of the note, the sum of four hundred dollars for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowe v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ringgold v. Haven & LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Vaca Valley & Clear Lake Railroad v. MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bowley v. Mangrum & OtterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. Peoples Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Bard v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API