Legal Opinion
Kent v. First Trust & Savings Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 22, 1950No. Civ. 17475PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
Ignoring the established rule that on appeal this court will view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, plaintiff-appellant in this action has recited only that evidence which is favorable to him.
The action was brought against the executor of the estate of Mara McKee, deceased, to recover on a rejected claim on a promissory note signed by decedent. Plaintiff is appealing from the judgment after a verdict in favor of defendant.
The note, for the principal sum of $30,000, is dated November 4, 1943, payable to plaintiff’s order three years after date, with interest at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Eisenbaum v. Western Energy Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Gross v. NeedhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Ogier v. Pacific Oil & Gas Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.