Legal Opinion

Gaspar v. Linvatec Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 7, 1997No. 95 C 3574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA District Judge.

Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment by all defendants and plaintiffs. For the reasons that follow, the court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment, denies plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, and enters judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs in this case.

I. BACKGROUND 1

Plaintiff Larry Gaspar (“Gaspar”) and the 18 other class plaintiffs worked for Linvatec Corporation (“Linvatec”), a subsidiary of Bristol-Myers Squibb (“Bristol-Myers”). On September 24, 1993, Bristol-Myers announced that…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. National PropaneDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  2. Pamela Hertel Mers v. Marriott International Group Accidental Death and Dismemberment PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Ninaus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API