Legal Opinion
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports
Decided October 8, 1991No. 91-303Published
1Opinion of the Court
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California DANIEL E. LUNGREN Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 91-303 of : : OCTOBER 8, 1991 DANIEL E. LUNGREN : Attorney General : : ANTHONY S. Da VIGO : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE HONORABLE L. B. ELAM, COUNTY COUNSEL, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, has requested an opinion on the following questions: 1. Do judges and commissioners of the municipal court qualify as "state" officers or employees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- County of Madera v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Happell v. SischoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Villanazul v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.