Legal Opinion
In Re Evans
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 24, 1990No. 89-953PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon its determination that respondent, an attorney, took funds of an estate without authority and so engaged in misappropriation, in violation of DR 9-103(A), the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) has recommended that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for six months. The Board set forth its findings, conclusions, and recommendation in a lucid and thorough report which we adopt and reproduce as an appendix hereto. 1 We accept the Board’s findings of fact, which in essence sustained as supported by substantial evidence detailed findings made by a Hearing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Matter of BuckleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re RayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re ChoroszejDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.