Legal Opinion

Ditzler v. Spee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1970No. 42480PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

This matter is before the court on an alternative writ of prohibition secured by the plaintiffs Ditzler to enjoin the prosecution of a declaratory judgment action instituted by defendant Spee. The issue is whether a defendant in a personal injury action brought by the owner and by the operator of an automobile can require that the unsued claim of plaintiffs’ minor child be litigated in the same proceedings. The lower court held that under the peculiar circumstances of this case defendant Spee was entitled to have the liability question as to both the parents and their child…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Lustik v. RankilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Radmacher v. CardinalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Family Center Drug Store, Inc. v. North Dakota State Board of PharmacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. K.M.S. Research Laboratories, Inc. v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Country Insurance v. Agricultural Development, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mammoth Medical, Inc. v. BunnellKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  5. United Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API