Legal Opinion

Maybee v. Machart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1988No. 54382-8PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This case involves a writ of garnishment against a county clerk who held funds in trust to satisfy a superior court judgment. The issue is whether a clerk's trust fund is subject to garnishment prior to a court order directing disbursement of those funds. The trial court held the funds were subject to garnishment. The clerk appealed. The Court of Appeals modified the trial court order, but affirmed. Maybee v. Machart, 48 Wn. App. 502, 739 P.2d 122 (1987). We reverse.

The Maybees obtained a $3,576.60 district court judgment against Machart and Bales. They filed their judgment in Yakima County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hardy v. Construction Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Russell & Co. v. MillettWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hooten v. ConklinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robb v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Heritage Restoration, Inc v. Douglas Radabaugh, Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State v. A.N.W. Seed Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API