Hooten v. Conklin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eose Smith, J.
The question here is whether a fund in the registry of the chancery court, deposited in the form of a cash bond, may be reached by a writ of garnishment after the chancellor has filed an opinion awarding a portion of the fund to the garnishment debtor.
Crabtree, the garnishment debtor, brought suit in the Union Chancery Court to impress a lien upon oil and gas interests owned by the appellant Hays, a nonresident of the state. To keep the suit from interfering with the payment of oil runs Hays deposited $6,500 in court, as a cash bond for the payment of any judgment Crabtree might obtain. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- McGill v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Green v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Orchard & Wilhelm Co. v. NorthNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Gaither v. . BallewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Maybee v. MachartWashington Supreme Court · 1988