Legal Opinion

Brophy v. Cities Service Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, Chancellor:

The question is whether the amended complaint states a cause of action against Thomas , F. Kennedy, one of the defendants. Four causes are alleged, but only one seeks any relief against him. It appears that with the exception of Kennedy, the individual defendants were directors of Cities Service Company throughout the period involved in the action and constituted the controlling majority of the board. The gravamen of the charge against Kennedy is that at all times material he was employed in an “executive capacity” and as “confidential secretary” to the defendant, W.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Irving Trust Co. v. DeutschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Essex Trust Co. v. EnwrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Desimone v. BarrowsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  5. American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API